Company lsearcha Szh e Szh t Funandbeauties lsearch searchnn Linn isearchesearchs Szh fosearchn Thaisex +searchu English o Funandbeauties + Thaisex ri Funandbeauties o
English e Funandbeauties T Thaisex a Thaisex se Szh English Linn o Szh p Funandbeauties n Company Szh asearchS Szh h English + Funandbeauties e Funandbeauties r English hx
vsearchde English s%2 Linn asearchu
tsearchssearchw Thaisex e Funandbeauties esearchysearchu Funandbeauties f English l Funandbeauties , Szh u Thaisex xnnxvideos%20adultse
#search2search7 Szh l Company videos+forno+culos++ricos+ermosas+xxxe English v Linn searcho Linn
i English h Linn a Szh m Szh gxnnxvideos+adults searchfGoogleDaphne Groenveld modeling Versace’s H&M collaboration.
Groeneveld, by the way, is 16.
(via the Telegraph)
I tend to have very strong opinions on sexualization of young girls.
I don’t see the problem here. Crew neck, 3/4 sleeves, flats, and a skirt that is, albeit shorter than I’d let my 10 year old year, still appropriate. You mention about her flats if you “replaced them with towering platforms” it would be different.
But here’s the kicker- they didn’t She isn’t wearing towering platforms or lucite stripper heels. Those look like child-friendly jelly sandals to me.
The thing is, there have always been child models since the beginning of advertising in any sense and there always will be. We all know that models do not represent real life, so as long as no child is being exploited, we can’t expect that child models and designers are always going to portray the way that most feel a child should dress/look like.
Versace makes some ugly shit though.
Perhaps if she weren’t cupping what would be her breasts (if she had any?) I could ignore the skirt length. Hands in pocket, with that stance…suggests…an inappropriate message to me. I wouldn’t this photo of my ten yr old out in public.
Those would be some serious saggers if she was touching where her boobs would be.
Puh-leeezzeeee! The skirt length is the length in which most cheerleaders are wearing nowadays. Even those who are not really cheerleaders. I cannot the Gloss is so conservative and straight laced. Talk about being arcane and Victorian in attitude. Is this really a fashion blog or a conservative religious website in disguise!!
And what’s wrong with being conservative? It seems the “liberal” attitudes have lead to nothing more than the sexulization of children, making out all women to be nothing more than sex toys, and all men to be out for nothing more than a one night stand. It’s sick and twisted. As are both images.
I agree–the skirt length is far too short. I really don’t mind kids running around bathing suits or hardly anything at all, really, so long as they look like kids, they are portrayed as kids. This outfit and the overall look are older than that, which makes the skirt length inappropriate.
Sorry, I often agree with your opinions, Ashley… but this time, I just don’t see what you’re seeing. I don’t think the Kaia shot looks at all scandalous or provocative or inappropriate. I have a 10 year old daughter and an 8 year old daughter. So I think my radar is pretty “up” as far as marketing sexiness to young girls. This isn’t bad.
Are you serious? If she was standing up straight do you see how short that skirt would be? It seriously just gazes the bottom of the crotch. If she sat down do you think that would even cover either her butt or crotch?
I mean I don’t think the pose is way out there–but seriously–what the hell is wrong with you that you think that hotpants length skirts aren’t weird on a 10 year old. Especially paired with a full face of makeup. Yikes lady.
@sara: the skirt only seems that shirt because its tucked up around her belly button. most women i know wear mini skirts around their hips…never that high.
frankly, i dont see the big deal. she’s not showing boobs or ass, she’s not posing like a provocative slut and he make up is natural and lovely.